they found one!! now only 37,874,436,102,229 to go and their theory will finally be credible!!
at the risk of being obtuse, i just want everyone to realize how many such transitional fossils there would have to be if this theory were true. so many you couldn't till your garden without having to remove several. and digging a posthole? why the stupid thing would simply be full of bones.
give me a flippin' break. some of the smartest people in the world are the most ridiculously ignorant.
and this?
the idiots are so caught up in their insane attempts to discredit the divinity of Christ they didn't read the story. like the part where Peter also walked on the water. at the boat. which was being rather violently tossed about by the storm. and by some strange coincidence, the ice ran out at just the same time Peter started to notice the boisterous waves (good thing the violent storm for which Galilee is famous didn't affect that thin ice) and stopped looking at Jesus. of course, then Jesus took Peter and they both went back to the ship... the same way Peter had come. where... umm... there wasn't any ice... because... you might remember... Peter had just sunk there.
I guess it's a good thing Jesus knew all the ice paths huh.
and this religious guy at the end of the article that's supposed to bring some superficial sort of balance to the 37 paragraphs that have gone before? according to this lunatic, "research on the condition of Lake might have interesting implications on scientific and natural basis, but should not be linked to the miracle recounted in the Gospels." well that sounds nice, until he tells you why.
""They are trying to make sense out of a nonsense. The Gospels have nothing to do with historical accounts, they are simply literature — one literary account over another," Eisenman told Discovery News. "Trying to scientifically explain literature really makes no sense."
boy i'm sure glad they gave some rational arguments from the other side.
if this doesn't make you mad, you are not jealous enough for the glory of God.
let me just say it... this is all bunk, crap, but mostly a bunch of other words that I can't say.
for crying out loud. fools. poor fools.
yes, there is a place for that word, and this is one of them. (Rom. 1:22... one of myriad)
Even so, come quickly Lord Jesus.
"I ought to say that it isn't an ordinary sort of boat. Sometimes it's a Boat, and sometimes
it's more of an Accident. It all depends."
"Depends on what?"
"On whether I'm on the top of it or underneath it."
13 comments:
yeah i saw that. it highly ticks me off.
the weird thing i've noticed is that it's not the science professors who push evolution. it's your liberal arts cuckoos who don't have enough knowledge to know what they're talking about when it comes to science at all. (i usually have a few swift comments when those silly professors go off on an evolution tangent in the middle of discussing a poem.) i had a chemistry professor in Auburn, fruity environmentalist liberal as they come, who said in lecture that carbon-14 dating is completely inaccurate if you're looking at things any older that 3 or 4 thousand years.
so to any evolutionists out there who might be reading:
YOUR THEORY IS PROOFLESS. I'LL BATTLE WITH YOU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.
"But if God be for us, who can be against us?"
Wow. Watch Dan attack stupidity with the strength of Chuck Norris.
From the 4-5-06 comic strip, B.C.:
Man reading "Wiley's Dictionary":
The word? Science Fiction
The definition? Any scientific claim that omits God
Hi guys.
I'm a microbiologist in Nashville, TN. Please don't attack my industry. I remind you, who have given you every comfort you know today. Show some repect. You are not scientists, and thus you haven't earned the right to comment on such matters. God help you if you honestly think you can do a better job than us.
When I open the dictionary to "idiot", I see the same picture posted as the owner of this weblog. Coincidence? Evolution?
Sir Burrito,
There are plenty of Christian scientists who contributed to your "industry" giving us the comforts we all enjoy today. No need to give all that glory to evolutionists. Attacking evolution isn't attacking science itself - there's plenty of science having nothing to do with evolution. Also, I request that you refrain from leaving comments containing curse words on my blog. There's really no need for a mature adult to do that. Thank you.
um Burrito man...do you ReaLLy wanna go there?
A dictionary with pictures! How adorable. My kids used to use those back when they were preschoolers.
Does anyone here provide shovels when it gets too deep or do you continue blathering as your heads disappear?
Ah. Classic sign of an illogical argument. Resorting to insults and name-calling. Nice.
Mr. Burrito,
Can I just say that if you call evolution "Science" then you are only making fun of your own beloved profession. If I were a scientist, which by the way Nurses are considered scientists, I would NEVER want to use the THEORY of Evolution as my basis for being scientifically and logically sound since it is neither.
And Mr. Galt...do you have anything credible to bring? Or are you just one of those people who will blindly follow a theory like its fact just because you want to sound like your intellegent because you speak out again the simple, ignorant Christians.
For shame. Come up with something real to throw at us instead of silly little insults that I used when I was 5.
And need I call to your attention Mr. Burrito, That your profession of Microbiology is just expounding on things that the Hebrew people back 5000 years ago already knew because they were given laws, By God, on such things as washing, cleanliness, prevetion of contact with bodily fluids. All of these things which directly relate to Microbiology since its the microbes in those fluids that cause disease.
So those silly, God following people lived longer because...huh...God knew something about microbiology. Enough to help them prevent infection and live longer than their neighbors.
Post a Comment